Letters: Doctor Debate: Is wellness testing good medicine?
I agree that defensive medicine is not a warranted reason for wellness testing, but I do not believe that we are far from a much bigger arena of litigation than we currently encounter. So I do not see the harm in wellness testing or preanesthetic testing. I personally know that as a 21-year-old healthy veterinary student I was required to have preanesthetic testing before orthopedic surgery, and it was required again a decade later for a subsequent orthopedic surgery after my anterior cruciate ligament ruptured while I was playing softball (I was healthy then, too). I am sure that we all can agree that, given an opportunity, lawyers will inquire why lab work was not performed before any procedure. The assumption exists that a problem could have been avoided by obtaining such information.
As to Dr. Robbins' comment on disease screening, I fully disagree that wellness profiles are not indicated. His statistics seem to overlook that you evaluate lab results in conjunction with the patient's physical examination results. Many dehydrated animals have normal hematocrits until you hydrate them and identify severe anemia. It is imperative that lab work be interpreted based on not only its values but also on how it relates to the patient's physical findings. Microscopic hematuria, which can't be noted by the owner, may reveal urinary calculi and possibly an underlying urinary tract infection. Screening for problems may reveal diseases in which early intervention may be curative or at least allow for better management of the disease.