In this retrospective study of 100 cases from a veterinary college, preoperative abdominal ultrasonography and exploratory
laparotomy findings were reviewed to determine agreement and discrepancy rates and identify lesions likely to be missed by
ultrasonography. Imaging was performed by one of three experienced radiologists or by residents working under their direct
Nineteen cats and 81 dogs were included in the study, 47 of which were medium-sized dogs (10 to 27 kg). The results of the
imaging and the surgery were classified according to anatomical location and gross pathologic features. Additionally, surgical
findings were categorized as primary (main lesion) or secondary (other related) lesions.
The most common primary surgical findings were splenic or liver masses (30 cases), peritonitis (28 cases), and intestinal
obstruction (14 cases). The sensitivities of ultrasonography for detecting these conditions were 63%, 89%, and 64%. No apparent
relationship was detected between patient body size and the sensitivity of ultrasonography. A major discrepancy was observed
between ultrasonography and identification of the main surgical lesion in 25% of the cases. Gastrointestinal ulcerations,
perforations, and ruptures were the surgical findings most frequently missed by preoperative imaging. There was also a trend
for organomegaly to be missed by ultrasonography. In 64% of the cases, the imaging and surgical reports agreed. The authors
concluded that preoperative ultrasonography was useful.
Abdominal ultrasonography is a widely used noninvasive diagnostic modality, especially in ill animals requiring preoperative
evaluation. The authors cite various studies in animals that have documented the sensitivity of ultrasonography in evaluating
specific conditions (carcinomatosis and hepatobiliary disease) or presenting clinical signs such as hemoperitoneum after blunt
trauma. These clinicians and residents had a success rate of either 64% (agreement with surgeons) or 75% (identification of
primary lesion). It is worthwhile to note that body size did not affect the sensitivity of ultrasonography. However, morbid
conditions affecting the integrity of the gastrointestinal tract were missed.
Pastore GE, Lamb CR, Lipscomb V. Comparison of the results of abdominal ultrasonography and exploratory laparotomy in the
dog and cat. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2007;43(5):264-269.
The information in "Research Updates" was provided by Veterinary Medicine Editorial Advisory Board member Joseph Harari, MS, DVM, DACVS, Veterinary Surgical Specialists, 21 E. Mission Ave., Spokane,