BENEFITS FOR SOME
Several potential benefits of digital radiography will only be realized in certain veterinary practices or with certain digital
radiography systems. These benefits vary in importance depending on the size of the practice and must be weighed against the
initial cost of the digital radiography system.
Digital radiography can reduce the per- study cost of radiography because there will be no film costs, no real estate costs
for a room to archive radiographs, and no processor maintenance costs for direct radiography (DR) systems or lower processor
maintenance costs for computed radiography (CR) systems (see the article "Exploring your digital radiography equipment options" ).3 These savings will be easily realized by larger veterinary practices and referral practices because larger practices spend
more money on film and processing than smaller veterinary hospitals do.
For smaller practices, the initial cost of digital radiography will likely outweigh any hard-cost savings. For example, the
yearly maintenance contract may cost more than a small practice will spend on film and processing chemicals in a given year.
In their cost analyses, practitioners must also consider the cost of computer hardware upgrades, future software upgrades,
monitor upgrades, network upgrades, off-site image backup, a faster Internet connection, and additional computer monitors.
Soft-cost savings are difficult to quantify. They include how much time technicians must spend looking for lost films or filing
and retrieving films.3 For a large referral hospital whose staff is constantly searching for films, the soft-cost savings can be substantial since
technicians will spend less time on these menial tasks and have more time for meaningful tasks. For most smaller veterinary
hospitals, these soft-cost savings will likely be less apparent.
Ease of use
Digital radiography systems can be much easier to use than film-based systems and often require less technical expertise to
obtain high-quality radiographs. However, digital radiography systems vary widely in their ease of use. Practices purchasing
systems that are user-friendly and that consistently produce high-quality images will often take more radiographs each month
than before the digital radiography system was installed. Conversely, in practices with difficult-to-use systems or with less
computer-savvy staff members, a digital radiography system may become a source of frustration.
In human medicine, DR systems, such as flat panel detectors and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras, increase patient throughput
since the time necessary to obtain digital radiographic images is less than with CR and film.4 Similar studies have not been done in veterinary medicine, but in my experience, DR systems increase veterinary patient
throughput as well. Increased throughput is clearly a benefit in larger veterinary practices and referral hospitals, but for
many smaller hospitals, the increased throughput and time savings may not be as substantial. Therefore, despite the reduced
patient throughput associated with CR, CR remains a valid imaging modality in veterinary medicine.
Decreased radiation exposure to patients and personnel
Fewer retakes mean fewer exposures, resulting in an overall decrease in radiation exposure to patients and personnel. Some
digital radiography systems also require less radiation per exposure to produce a high-quality radiograph than film-based
systems do. Conversely, other digital radiography systems necessitate more radiation (sometimes a large increase) per exposure.5 The overall effect on radiation doses to patients and personnel will vary depending on the digital radiography system.
Improved radiographic quality
In any practice that has problems obtaining high-quality radiographs using film, digital radiography will likely improve patient
care by improving radiographic quality. Most digital radiography systems are less user- and technique-dependent than film-based
systems, thereby reducing the number of poor-quality radiographs due to exposure errors. Darkroom and processing artifacts
are also eliminated. Improved image quality is one of the main reasons many veterinary practices are migrating to digital
WEIGHING THE BENEFITS AND COSTS
So is digital radiography right for your practice? For new practices that do not have a film system or processing room and
for large practices, the move to digital is easily justified. But the case for digital radiography is not as simple for smaller
hospitals. Thoroughly evaluating the potential benefits of digital radiography, understanding the differences among digital
radiography systems, performing a cost analysis, and assessing your practice's needs and expectations will help you determine
whether digital radiography is right for you.
Matt Wright, DVM, DACVR
The Veterinary Imaging Center of San Diego
7522-7524 Clairemont Mesa Blvd.
San Diego, CA 92111
1. Curry III TS, Dowdey JE, Murry Jr RC. Christensen's physics of diagnostic radiology. 4th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1990;402-403.
2. Merritt CR, Tutton RH, Bell KA, et al. Clinical application of digital radiography: computed radiographic imaging. Radiographics 1985;5:397-414.
3. Orand MR. Cost analysis: film vs. PACS. Radiol Today 2004;5:38.
4. Andriole KP, Luth DM, Gould RG. Workflow Assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient
environment. J Digit Imaging 2002;15 (Suppl 1):124-126.
5. Wright M. Expected exposure techniques in veterinary digital radiography. Animal Insides 2006. Available at: